2. misc-audio
  3. 158341-132356

You didn't hear it here.

Dr.Aix strikes again.

"Additionally, the guru behind MQA — Robert Stuart — wrote in another AES paper, “... there exist audible signals that cannot be encoded transparently by a standard CD; and second, an audio chain used for such experiments must be capable of high-fidelity reproduction.” His position is untenable if the results of my survey are true. If real world audiophiles cannot hear a difference then there is no audible difference."
128x128fuzztone

Showing 4 responses by fuzztone

fuzztone's avatar
fuzztone OP
5,510 posts
 
I dunno
I see claims not proofs.
Scientific you are not 
Besides that is totally off topic.
fuzztone's avatar
fuzztone OP
5,510 posts
 
Thanx Bob
Pollute does as polluted is.

fuzztone's avatar
fuzztone OP
5,510 posts
 
@robertdid   

No link.
It was pulled from an email that went out to all participants. You found it easily enough.Dr. Waldrep was open to input last year when he designed the challenge if you wanted to "prove" anything to/for yourself, you COULD have showed that you can hear the difference better than chance guesses.Most didn't even though they thought they could, going in. Ito
Now you are just a Monday quarterback.
Mark produces and sells HiRez recordings so he has reverse incentive for the findings.

fuzztone's avatar
fuzztone OP
5,510 posts
 
Didn't have to refute. This study was public enough that you COULD have had some input. That's all I said.
You can pick on this one without citing?
More to discover