Yamaha vs Marantz vs Denon


I'm about to replace a stereo amp (NAD c320) with a surround receiver. The top of my list is the Denon avr2309 (around AU$1300-$1500), but I'm after opinions on which of these three brands are considered the most "musical"; that is, the receiver most likely to do a good job of two-channel music.
Most of the receivers in this price range do everything else I want (7.1ch, auto setup, all the new HD codecs, several HDMI in/outs etc), but the deciding factor for me will be the brand that handles stereo music well.

Now I know I should be doing my own listening tests, but it's very hard where I am to find stores carrying all the models I want to compare, let alone finding the time; I value your opinions!!
carl109

Showing 2 responses by doggg

I like my onkyo 906 for 2 channel as well as 7.1 but out of the brands that you list marantz is probably your best bet. Kinda depends on what you want though. The marantz has a warm sound(similar to tube equip). The denon is more analytical. I've heard that the arcam receivers sound good in 2 channel but I don't think they have hdmi 1.3. Don't know a whole lot bout the yamaha's.
Marantz & denon are owned by the same company. From everything that I've read as well as experienced denon has been better at video and surround processing and the marantz line is talked about as being more musical. Imho this is how they sounded to me when I listened to them. I was comparing the current top of the line marantz and the comparable ($1500) denon.