Yamaha RX-V1 Is it any better then the DSP A1


The RX-V1 is selling for around $1,600. The Yamaha-A1 you can buy for around $800. The Question is, Is the RX-V1 worth twice the price of the A1?. Or do they sound about the same?. Has anyone compared them both?
polcat
Thank you for your advice, Your right, If your going to spend more then $1,600 then your better off getting separates.
They should sound about the same, except that RX-V1 has a tuner because the A1 is only an integrated amp and the latter is a receiver.

I used to own a Yamaha RX-V2095, which was one notch below the A1. A year later I wanted to upgrade to the AX-1 (same version as the RX-V1, except without the tuner). I A/B tested both the V2095 and AX-1 with the same cd player and speakers at my audio dealer, and found only very minute (and I do mean minute) difference in sound between the two, due mostly to the better amp in AX-1 versus V2095, and not the DSP chip, according to my dealer.

If you really want to spend $1,600, my advice to you is to buy separates, or if you really set on the DSP functions of Yamaha, then buy the A-1 and then add a separate 5 channel amp. Then you will realize how important a decent amp really is in a system, or conversely, how lousy (and I do mean lousy) an amp all receivers have in them......