XM now sounds worse


I've recently noticed that when listening to XM Radio, the sound on XM Classics and some other stations is thin, distorted slightly on the high end. I think that while the sound has'nt always been great, it used to sound better than this. I can't figure if it's my system or XM has lowered sound quality by adding more stations.

My setup is kinda strange: The Polk XM Tuner is hooked to a Ramsey FM100 FM Transmitter to brodcast (thru my house only) to my various tuners. Now I do know that this is an 'extra processing step' - but this USED to sound great. Could Lightning possibly mess up the sound in the Polk Tuner without totally frying it? It does'nt make any sense because it used to sound good. I have several different systems in my home, and receiving XM in this manner NOW sounds bad in All my various systems, whereas it used to sound good. So I don't think it is a bad receiving tuner, or the fact I have too much equipment plugged in - like I said it used to sound good, but now....

Any thoughts would be appreciated.
joeylawn36111

Showing 2 responses by kjweisner

I don't know if this even remotely helps because it's more a response about XM quality overall, and introduces new variables. I receive XM as part of my DirectTV package and have it enabled through a Marantz processed and powered home theater with B&W CDM-NT speakers, as well as through a Meridian digital home theater system.

I can hear a significant difference between the two that is attibutable to more than just the build quality of the gear. What I've noticed is that on my Marantz rig, the quality is as you described, and I've tried every form of processing, including "direct" and none sound that good to me.

Conversely, on the meridian system, using Trifield processing the sound is quite remarkable. I can push it to high volumes without egregious harm, but can't do so on the other system. When I go into 'direct' mode, it's better than on the Marantz system, but still falls apart musically.

Unscientifically, I attribute this to the meridian's capabilities in both upsampling and bit length conversion as well as general processing capability (trifield is good with all source material, but seems to really forgive bad stuff). Meridian also keeps everything digital, right out to the speakers, so it may be able to deal with the source material better in that domain.

So, my conclusion is that the XM signal is pretty low grade, comparatively speaking. My variable is getting via DirecTV, so who knows if it's being crushed to fit in the allowed bandwidth.
I would definitely agree with your take on the different channels. I wonder if there is a difference in bandwidth that is allocated to the different channels. Seems like a plausible idea given that the fidelity needed for talk would be less than that needed for higher quality recorded music. Perhaps the classical material has been deemed to be less popular, and therefore not worthy of more bandwidth. I haven't read anything in the audio rags, but will keep an eye out.