I too use Mogami Gold Studio xlr cable. A good source is B&H Photo Video.
For unbalanced cables, I've been pleased with Markertek's terminated Mogami 2534 cable.
Sam (C1Ferrari) -- FYI, my understanding is that the main differences between the Mogami 2534 and their AES/EBU cables are:
1)The AES/EBU cables have somewhat lower capacitance, which would only make a difference if cable length is long AND the output impedance of the component driving the cable is high. In that situation it would provide a more extended upper treble.
2)The AES/EBU cables have somewhat higher inductance, which shouldn't make any difference in a line-level interconnect.
The higher inductance and lower capacitance are a consequence of the AES/EBU cable's higher (110 ohm) characteristic impedance.
3)The AES/EBU cables do not have a star-quad configuration, which might mean a slightly increased susceptibility to noise pickup.
Best regards,
-- Al
For unbalanced cables, I've been pleased with Markertek's terminated Mogami 2534 cable.
Sam (C1Ferrari) -- FYI, my understanding is that the main differences between the Mogami 2534 and their AES/EBU cables are:
1)The AES/EBU cables have somewhat lower capacitance, which would only make a difference if cable length is long AND the output impedance of the component driving the cable is high. In that situation it would provide a more extended upper treble.
2)The AES/EBU cables have somewhat higher inductance, which shouldn't make any difference in a line-level interconnect.
The higher inductance and lower capacitance are a consequence of the AES/EBU cable's higher (110 ohm) characteristic impedance.
3)The AES/EBU cables do not have a star-quad configuration, which might mean a slightly increased susceptibility to noise pickup.
Best regards,
-- Al