Wilson Sabrina (not X), Sonus Faber Nova 2, or Vandersteen Treo CT

I have not heard Wilsons or SF.

But then again I have older Vandys, and have not been disappointed over many decades.

@delmatae I do not know much about that amp, but you may want to consider a sub to relieve some of the bass if that amp does not have an abundance of umphf.

Even though most everyone in this thread is rating the Vandy, it would be good to have a listen/demo, as the people rating the Vandy high, are somewhat biased. (Myself included)

In all probability it is the best choice. But I am not 100% convinced that the Treo would be better than a 2C +sub (at a fixed budget). I think it would be… but I would be calling a dealer.

If you had gotten the 2C back in 88, then I would be telling you to get 1 or 2 of the subs now.

The Treo with the sub should be a step up from a 2, which is very good. So you likely want to have some budget for a sub now or later, just in case the amp is not much of a bass slammer.

 

@holmz ,

The Treo was a significant upgrade from the 3a Sigs I owned before them.

Overall, a more refined sound.

Though I do agree with getting a sub or two.

His Mac 152 should have plenty of oomph to drive a pair of Treo’s, as well as just about any decently designed speaker.

B

I thought so, but now we are al sure. 😉
Thanks Sir… aka @gdnrbob