Why is 2 Channel better than multi-channel?


I hear that the music fidelity of a multi-channel AV Receiver/Integrated amp can never match the sounds produced by a 2 channel system. Can someone clearly explain why this is so?

I'm planning to upgrade my HT system to try and achieve the best of both worlds, I currently have a 3 channel amp driving my SL, SR, C and a 2 channel amp driving my L and R.
I have a Denon 3801 acting as my pre. Is there any Pre/Proc out there that can merge both worlds with out breaking my bank? Looking for recommendations on what my next logical steps should be? Thanks in advance.
springowl

Showing 1 response by b-arbucklef364

I listen to two channel sound (w/Sub)for critical listening and use the front three channels (w/Sub)for "enjoying the music". There is a difference to which is better due to the fact that some recordings are better suited for different systems.

System is Mcintosh MX 132, Mcintosh Mc402, and MC202 (Bridged for Center Channel). Speakers are M/L Aeris I with Cinema Center. Sub is Martin Logan Depth (I have it hooked up for two channel sub as well as LFE through Processor.)

System is very smooth. While in three channel mode the Air Blends somewhat, the smoothness more than compensates. All in All, a great system either way. the two channel provides more of the audiopyile music listening experience with the seperation of instruments, tight tuneful base, etc, etc, etc.

Could not be happier with the Mac Amps. The extra power on the M/L is greatful on certain recordings.