Not only that, but.........
Has anyone ever looked closely at the "reference" systems these guys use? And how often they change?
They run the gamut from dreck to last year's hot items.
The point is that usually they use a mish-mash of gear that usually doesn't meld worth a diddly-squat, and that makes their "reviews" even harder to believe. When you have piece "A" that screams, and piece "B" that is dull, how can they tell what "X" is really like when it replaces one of them in their system.
Keep Porziob's post in mind while you ponder why their systems are always in flux.
Then there is the problem of fudged test data. Another story for another thread.
Has anyone ever looked closely at the "reference" systems these guys use? And how often they change?
They run the gamut from dreck to last year's hot items.
The point is that usually they use a mish-mash of gear that usually doesn't meld worth a diddly-squat, and that makes their "reviews" even harder to believe. When you have piece "A" that screams, and piece "B" that is dull, how can they tell what "X" is really like when it replaces one of them in their system.
Keep Porziob's post in mind while you ponder why their systems are always in flux.
Then there is the problem of fudged test data. Another story for another thread.