Why do contributors delete their own posts?


A significant contributor who shall remain unidentified deletes posts shortly afterwards. It’s not done with the intent of correction, but for the purpose of limited viewing. I wonder what rationale warrants this behavior. It certainly not for the benefit of providing context for later viewers who might want to learn from the thread. 
celander

Showing 13 responses by celander

geoffkait15,259 posts05-12-2019 5:41pmCriteria? How about it looks like a troll, it walks like a troll and it talks like a troll?

I guess “it writes like a troll” is not one such criteria.
Nothing in my OP suggested troll behavior. But leave it to a Troll-in-Chief to presume such. 
If the point of posting is to contribute to a thread, then why delete the post? Are their actions regarding their contribution is that such posts are somehow time-sensitive and having only limited value that warrants deletion thereafter?

I’m not interested immediate responses; those who post and delete their post shortly thereafter are only interested in immediate responses.
05-12-2019 6:15pm, Geoff wrote:

“jitter [sic] provides much humor with his 80% grammatically correct sentences.”

☝🏻☝🏻And speaking of grammatically incorrect phrases. Lol

I cannot post more than 3 successive posts, per the GK rule. 
I agree that one never knows who (author or system) deletes the posts. But I strongly suspect members are deleting their posts as the content doesn’t seem to warrant a deletion by another means pertaining to violating a system forum policy. 
jetter, the appearance of a deleted post is not dictated by how it gets deleted.