Why are so many albums poorly remastered onto cd


It seems like every time I read a review of a remastered album onto CD everybody just bags on the quality and from some of my experiences, rightfully so.The quality of music is going away so quickly, why is it so hard to remaster a album?
pinto72

Showing 2 responses by larryi

Yes, there are some reissues that suffer from tapes deteriorating over time, and a whole lot more reissues and new issues that suffer from shoddy and indifferent mastering/production.

But, I would guess that the primary driver for the pervasiveness of bad sounding recordings is public demand--"we" want compressed music to listen in high noise environments (car, subway, airplane, etc), "we" have become accustomed to, and prefer MP3 sound (a blind study showed that most young listeners prefer MP3 to CD).

Of course, by "we" I don't mean those of us who are concerned about sound quality, but, that "we" are in the minority. Perhaps, some day, those same listeners who don't care about sound quality will come around, and in that case, the recording industry will be more than happy to resell their catalogue in a higher quality format. In other words, the industry will make more money by selling crap recordings, as well as more expensive "audiophile" recordings, than it would make by making all issues decent in sound quality.
Mapman,

I generally find classical reissues to have good sound, often better than the original vinyl issue (e.g., DG recordings from the 1970s). A lot of jazz reissues sound good too. For me, much of the pop/rock catalogue sounds quite bad in recent reissues. I think it is a deliberate--trying to match the loudness of current recordings via heavy use of compression.