My Ref 3 also has 2 sets (4 in all)....two balanced and two SE, so it will be no problem
Showing 7 responses by oneobgyn
Ozzy...I run my X-2 series ll's full range and use my two Gotham's to fill in the bottom. Depending on the input impedance of your amps you might need a tube buffer or something similar as you will be running two loads in parallel. Here is how I solved the problem in my system http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?vaslt&1049587927&openflup&584&4#584 |
Not true, the Rel subs are more musical and also faster. They integrate better with high end speakers. If you are going 2 - channel get the Rel. Nothing loads a room better than a Rel! I dont think you will need the brute force of the JL, which is better for high SPL. BTW, there is absolutely no port noise. I hate to say it but you are delusional/ BTW, I would like to think that my Wilson X-2's are high end speakers. Prior to my pair of Gotham subs I was using a Wilson XS which had a pair of 18" drivers. After I heard the Gotham I immediately sold the XS as IMO it couldn't compete anywhere near as close to the Gotham. I agree that the pending 212 will be great as well. When it comes to JL Audio subs there hasn't been one critic that feels there is a better sub made. Here is an interesting read from Jeff Fritz http://www.ultraaudio.com/twbas/twbas_20080401.htm |
Joey I have a very good friend who has the TOL Rel in his system and each time he listens to my setup he just shakes his head and smiles. As far as cables I have ~$50K of cabling in my system so I am very familiar with cables and you are preaching to the choir. For the size of your room the F112 either singly or as a pair would work just fine. I agree with the previous poster as to the speed of the JL Audio drivers. A final caveat is perhaps your room isn't set up correctly or your subs weren't positioned properly. I also agree that it is a matter of preference. IMO the REL used to be the leader of the pack but they now have some catching up to do |