I am late into the response for this question. This is the first time I have entered into Audiogon discussion forum section.
After reading the above responses, I am tempted to express my views. I have sold many NHT speakers in the past 12 years. NHT is certainly not to be compared with very esoteric speakers such as the Wilsons or Avalons but it certainly does not deserve any bashing. I have had clients that have listened to Vandersteen sales presentation (90% influence on what you believe about that product is how it is presented)become very wordy about the characteristics of Vandersteen speakers. However, after a more objective listening and of course, subjective judgement, arrived at very much similar opinion for the most part that NHT's in general are very focused and gives natural sounds whereas Vandersteen tend to be more soft in highs and mids but heavier in bass. A particular client came to mind when he was brought into our showroom by a friend to listen to the NHT. (He owned then, a pair of Vandersteen, coincidently, 2 CE). As soon as he heard the first note of the music on a pair of 2.9 NHT powered by Aragon 8008BB, he exclaimed "That is the sound I wanted, ... natural sound of instruments and voice". After assisting him with improvement of his existing system which he was happy to have, he returned to pick up the NHT's.
VT2 is definitely much more dynamic than 3.3 or 2.9. In a hometheater setting it is a system hard to beat for price-performance measure.
Thanks
After reading the above responses, I am tempted to express my views. I have sold many NHT speakers in the past 12 years. NHT is certainly not to be compared with very esoteric speakers such as the Wilsons or Avalons but it certainly does not deserve any bashing. I have had clients that have listened to Vandersteen sales presentation (90% influence on what you believe about that product is how it is presented)become very wordy about the characteristics of Vandersteen speakers. However, after a more objective listening and of course, subjective judgement, arrived at very much similar opinion for the most part that NHT's in general are very focused and gives natural sounds whereas Vandersteen tend to be more soft in highs and mids but heavier in bass. A particular client came to mind when he was brought into our showroom by a friend to listen to the NHT. (He owned then, a pair of Vandersteen, coincidently, 2 CE). As soon as he heard the first note of the music on a pair of 2.9 NHT powered by Aragon 8008BB, he exclaimed "That is the sound I wanted, ... natural sound of instruments and voice". After assisting him with improvement of his existing system which he was happy to have, he returned to pick up the NHT's.
VT2 is definitely much more dynamic than 3.3 or 2.9. In a hometheater setting it is a system hard to beat for price-performance measure.
Thanks