I’ve never heard one wanting a Class D amp simply for no reason other than wanting one. So it’s an odd sort of thread. Having said that, here is one that might tweak your fancy: AGD Vivace Monoblock Class D amps. http://agdproduction.com/
Which Class D Amplifier? PS Audio, Ghent, Nord, Merrill or other???
I’m looking for a new amp & want Class D.
I’ve seen various brands mentioned, such as PS Audio, Ghent, Nord, Merrel to name a few, but I’ve not heard any of them.
Which company is producing the best sounding Class D?
Which models should I be looking to demo?
Thanks
I’ve seen various brands mentioned, such as PS Audio, Ghent, Nord, Merrel to name a few, but I’ve not heard any of them.
Which company is producing the best sounding Class D?
Which models should I be looking to demo?
Thanks
Showing 23 responses by celander
Not that I understand everything said in this clip, it’s interesting to watch. https://youtu.be/g3-eKrltKkE |
@nordacoustics. I see you copied and pasted a customer review from your website into your post. Since this is easily viewed by a copied URL link, it would save everyone here time to simply read the first part of your post pertaining to your products and then allow them to decide whether they want to click on the URL link to read the customer review. |
Yes, personalities abound in these forum threads. And yes, folks have what one might call “signature statements” that amply showcase their strengths and faults. From what I can tell reading posts is that not a lot have actually personally heard this newer GaN-FET tech implemented into a class D audio amp design. So while the likes of AGD, Technics and Merrill might in principle sound terrific based upon this newer tech based upon the tech’s inherent theoretical advantages, they may also suck in real world implementation due to other designs flaws. I’m not saying that they do suck and that the older MOS FET tech operating at lower switching frequencies are still king of the hill in class D land. But one ought to be careful in proclaiming one design implementation dead based upon merely theoretical considerations of a newer FET tech design. |
At some point, folks need to be less critical of others with whom they disagree. Piling on with repeated posts is a form of abuse towards a member that the moderators regularly condemn and remedy by removing posts. George has stated he has heard a variety of class D designs in a variety of threads. Maybe doing a small amount of research before posting questions about his not having done so is in order. |
Certain users continue to pile on other members by essentially reposting attacks. This really needs to stop. If folks don’t stop engaging in this behavior, then the moderators will step in and delete the entire thread. I don’t really think the majority wants that to happen. Members need only make their point once in a single post. Continually making the same critical point against a member in follow-on posts is abusive. And to be clear, I’m the member who reported to the moderators that certain posts should be removed as being abusive to other members. |
Tossing arguably superior circuits or eval boards into a box will not likely make for a superior product providing a lasting satisfaction. Designers care about circuit board layout, trying to minimize circuit trace paths from RFI and noise perspectives. And then there are the vibration control and global noise/RFI isolation and reduction issues that come into play. |
GaN-FET manufacturers will be important to the implementation of the GaN tech in Class D audio amplifiers. And yes, wide spread availability of the GaN-FET’s will be needed to drive costs down. But GaN-FET modules designed for Microwave and RF applications will not benefit HEA class D applications. Just saying... |