Which cartridge for Graham 2.2 arm?


Just scored a Graham 2.0 factory upgraded to 2.2 with bearing cap and ceramic wand.
Conventional wisdom says that at 11 grams effective mass it would best be paired with a high-compliance cartridge, something on the order of 18uN/mm or higher?

Poking around on-line I see static AND active compliance listed for some carts; hoo boy a new variable...
Budget is not unlimited, say around $500 and I have no problem with used, in fact most of my stuff is.

Any Graham owners want to weigh in? Any one at all want to weigh in?

Associated equipment: Bix turntable, bel canto Pre-2P, Wyred 4 Sound amplifier, Wilson Audio Duettes
128x128tzed
@chakster , Correct, it was very poorly made. I had one.

@tzed , check out the Grado 1042. Also, you can always add mass to the tonearm to make it work with somewhat less compliant cartidges.
Hmmm, I hadn't considered messing with Mr. Graham's design. I have seen arms that have weighs to increase their mass though so I suppose it's not a terrible idea ;-)
I'll look at that Goldring, thanks.
I've got a 2.0 updated to the 2.2.  It came in the deluxe kit with overhang tool and an auxiliary counterweight.  I understood the effective mass to be 12g.  Seems about right.  A medium mass arm but capable of going higher mass if you want.  use the auxiliary cw and also you can use a headweight in order to dial mass in for a particular cartridge. 

I think of cartridges with medium or low compliance as potential match-up material.  Down to 10 (x 10¯6   cm/dyne)*  or as high as 16.  I've tried some lighter moving magnet cartridges with sub-optimal results, I thought.  The arm wants lower compliance.  It liked my Shelter 501-II.  And works nice with the DL-103r.  It was fine on an Ortofon Jubilee.  Beautiful output.  I feel the arm allows the cartridge to speak fully when the mass and compliance are right.  High quality intricately machined tonearm.  Delicate and beautiful.

-Steve