what system musicians prefer? Do they care?


I have never aspired to be a musician, although I am very artistic.  I am bad at singing and never enjoyed dabbling at playing an instrument. But I enjoy listening to music tremendously and I always wondered if being a musician would improve my experience as a listener. It seems to me that musicians (good ones) would have a lot more expertise in sound, what is good quality sound, a good system, a high fidelity speaker.... but I have never seen any proof. Am I just imagining it? Are good musicians mediocre listeners? Are they not obsessed with good sound? Any musicians out there to comment?
One example I know is the  Cambridge Soundworks Mick Fleetwood Speaker System, which I finally purchased last year, I knew my collection would not be complete without it. It's evidence of great talents crossing paths: a  genious speaker designer Henry Kloss, and Mick Fleetwood, one of the greatest drummers of the century (and  the previous one). But I don't see musicians weighing in on what are good systems are, how much is it worth spending and what to focus on. It's much more like rich douchebags bragging about the price of their systems on these forums. 
gano

Showing 1 response by ttippie

There is more than one way to appreciate music. There is somewhat different cognitive equipment developed through the process of becoming a composer, arranger or performer.  A high level audio engineer also has specialized cognitive equipment.  Among the audio engineers I've worked with there are skills specific to live sound that are distinct from studio tracking, mixing or mastering.  Audiophile listeners also have specialized cognitive equipment.  They're all good, but there is a tendency for people to underestimate skills they do not possess.

A classical pianist can listen to a performance of Vladimir Horrowitz on a mediocre stereo and really enjoy it.  They know in minute detail what a really good concert grand piano, tuned and voiced by a world class technician, sounds like.They also have the score stored (and can see it), along with a bunch of other information on harmony, articulation, balance, phrasing, dynamics, fingering etc.  They also know that even a single change of fingering can shift the feel of a phrase. They may have also played that particular piece thousands, or even tens of thousands, of times.  (Daniel Beremboim, admits that in his practicing he spends more than 90% of his time practicing nuances that less than one percent of his concert audience can even hear.)
In a similar way a high level jazz pianist will have listened to the music they consider formative with an intensity that verges on vengeance.  They'll put the recording on a slow-downer, slow it down to 20%, then save it in a file, then slow down that file to 20%.  From there they will filter out all the other frequencies they aren't interested in and focus on and transcribe the finest, quietest nuances that you cannot possibly hear in the native unaltered recording (because they get covered up by the ensemble).  They'll internalize that until it becomes fundamental to the way they practice.

Turns out human brains can use little bits of cognitive equipment from a wide array of skill sets to modify perception. In the case of music, a listener's brain can zoom in or even clean up the signal so that what they hear is better than the original.

Please don't get caught up in the equivalence of chest pounding routines.  Your kids could distinguish between songs in major and minor keys before the age of two.  That's cool.  But don't let it blind you to all the other nuances in the music you're listening to.