What's your experience with Channel Separation?


Channel separation, and crosstalk, are measures of how much a channel leaks into another.  It's expressed in dB, usually meaning how far below the driven channel the other channel which should be silent would remain.

In digital recordings channel separation is infinite.  A 111111 on the left channel remains 0000 on the right. It's at the analog reconstruction or afterwards that channel separation starts to be less than infinite.

I was reading a review of a Luxman integrated which measured around 70 dB of channel separation.  You think, well that's a lot worse than many digital sources, which is true, but, in absolute terms that means that one channel which outputs 1 V would bleed 0.0003V into the other.

Of course, this is one of the alleged benefits of mono block construction.  With separate chasis, power supplies and power cables we assume the channel separation to be infinite, but, honestly, with LP's providing far less than this often, does this value even matter after say, 60 dB? Have you heard this spec matter to you and if so what did you perceive?

erik_squires

Showing 1 response by elliottbnewcombjr

Channel Separation is an important specification for Phono Cartridges.

Channel Balance is also important.

Of course, other 'qualities' of a cartridge count, but keep in mind, any 'preferred' sound quality of any cartridge's Imaging is aided by these two 'relatively achievable' characteristics.

...................................

Consider that all imaging is Phantom, created solely by the relative volume of L volume to R volume.

Channel separation gives the preamp/amp/speakers help maintaining the intended Phantom Imaging.

Tight channel balance also gives a more precise signal/volume difference at the start. A wider image combined with tight control gives more distinction, sharper perception of particular instrument locations.

When you view a line of cartridges, observe, as price goes up, separation specs get wider, and balance specs get tighter.