What's the best EL84 amp?


My speakers have loved the two I’ve tried, both vintage. I would love to spend some money and get a great EL84 amp. Any suggestions? Not interested in an integrated. 

dhcod

Showing 22 responses by dhcod

Music Reference RM-10 Mk 1 acquired!

Thanks everyone for all the great suggestions. I'll circle back after trying out the RM10 for awhile. It'll be interesting to hear it vs my 9W 300B SET.

I have been trying to find a RM-10 for a year. They don't seem to pop up anymore.

Ok! I'm on the lookout! I also have a wanted ad on USAudiomart in case that's an easy way to communicate.

I actually had both version of the RM-9 (and got a chance to spend a day with Roger while he fixed one of them) and I think it's really about what you are pairing it with and what your ears like. Pretty sure with my current vintage bass reflex studio monitors, the Mk 1 would be better because these speakers are almost too clean sounding at time.

Still remember very well how hot those RM9s got. Toasty! But wonderful.

I had UA-1s with my ESL57s. They were awesome but not as good as the Rogue Atlas they made special for Quads. 

Interesting! I had a SIT-3 with my current setup and it just didn’t surpass the Sun Audio 300B and its 9 WPC. I really wanted it to work. Maybe I gave up too soon?

I miss Brooks more than anyone I’ve ever know in audio. What a gentle-man. I’ll never forget the day he gave me the key to the museum to have a look around.

I bet those Joules sound incredible. I also imagine you have very good air conditioning :)

We live in a small loft and I had the Stargates which were just wonderful and I really wanted to upgrade but the summers were tough!

pdreher, you may want to try a SET amp with those Altecs. You'd be surprised at how much you can get from 9W with very good iron. So far, my new RM-10 is actually a bit bass shy compared to the 300B SET amp I have. I've ordered other EL84 tubes to see if that's why but it's noticeable vs the SET and an old Scott EL84 amp I have. Both are tube rectified with huge transformers. I wonder if that's the difference?

All true so far. My guess is it's going to be a great amp to have, sitting next to my SET when I am on a non-bass kick. I sounds awesome and is a work of art.

I was hoping to replace the SET but maybe I just need to keep two amps to use depending on the mood...

Thank you. Very useful info!

I’m thinking now of keeping the RM10 and assembling a ESL57 system with an LP12 and a Marantz 7 Pre. An all mid century looking system!

I heard those ESLs around that time. We probably passed each other on the 405. I went to see him a couple times to work on my RM-9. He discussed wanting to buy. ARC, which was rumored to be up for sale at that point, because he knew everything that was wrong with their circuits. I called a VC friend but it never got any further than a theoretical conversation.

So the best that I've heard so far is the Scott 222C. Wow. Sounds like my SET but with more power. It's an integrated with Amperex EL84s, a Mullard 5AR4 and Tele 12AX7s, but it sounds great even bypassing my Lamm preamp. A tiny bit rough around the edges so I'll send it out to be restored but super fun amp.

Others listened to: Manley Mahi, Music Reference RM-10 Mk1, Heathkit UA2, an Eico, a Leben (EL34), Scott 208 (5791s).

I should try one. Those are two tubes I have not listened to, not counting a Quad amp I borrowed for a day.

Just to update in case anyone is interested. I got and had rebuilt a Fisher SA-100 which is the best sounding EL-84 I've heard out of all of the ones I've had. Simply, it has everything all the best ones have, near SET delicacy, but also BASS! I tried a Luxman vintage OTL and that sounds awesome but a little thin.... needs a preamp with tone controls.

I wish I had efficient enough speakers for that amp. I've heard really good things about it. In the end, I was disappointed in the RM-10 I and II compared to vintage EL84s that I have tried. Same with the Manley Mahis. Just no enough back to front imaging. Everything is so midrange-y forward.