What Matters and What is Nonsense


I’ve been an audiophile for approximately 50 years. In my college days, I used to hang around the factory of a very well regarded speaker manufacturer where I learned a lot from the owners. When I started with audio it was a technical hobby. You were expected to know something about electronics and acoustics. Listening was important, but understanding why something sounded good or not so good was just as important. No one in 1968 would have known what you were talking about if you said you had tweaked your system and it sounded so much better. But if you talked about constant power output with frequency, or pleasing second-order harmonic distortion versus jarring odd-order harmonics in amplification, you were part of the tribe.

Starting in the 1980s, a lot of pseudo scientific nonsense started appearing. Power cords were important. One meter interconnects made a big difference. Using a green magic marker on the edge of a CD was amazing. Putting isolation dampers under a CD transport lifted the veil on the music. Ugh. This stuff still make my eyes roll, even after all these years.

So I have decided to impart years and years of hard won knowledge to today’s hobbists who might be interested in reality. This is my list of the steps in the audio reproduction chain, and the relative importance of each step. My ranking of relative importance includes a big dose of cost/benefit ratio. At this point in the evolution of audio, I am assuming digital recording and reproduction.

Item / Importance to the sound on a scale of 1-10 / Cost benefit ratio

  • The room the recording was made in / 8 / Nothing you can do about it
  • The microphones and setup used in the recording / 8 / nothing you can do about it.
  • The equalization and mixing of the recording / 10 / Nothing you can do about it
  • The technology used for the recording (analog, digital, sample rate, etc.) / 5 / nothing you can do about it.
  • The format of the consumer recording (vinyl, CD, DSD, etc.) 44.1 - 16 really is good enough / 3 / moderate CB ratio
  • The playback device i.e. cartridge or DAC / 5 / can be a horribe CB ratio - do this almost last
  • The electronics - preamp and amp / 4 / the amount of money wasted on $5,000 preamps and amps is amazing.
  • Low leve interconnects / 2 / save your money, folks
  • Speaker cables / 3 / another place to save your money
  • Speakers / 10 / very very high cost to benefit ratio. Spend your money here.
  • Listening room / 9 / an excellent place to put your money. DSPs have revolutionized audio reproduction
In summary, buy the best speakers you can afford, and invest in something like Dirac Live or learn how to use REW and buy a MiniDSP HD to implement the filters. Almost everything else is a gross waste of money.
phomchick

Showing 4 responses by jdave

+2 Marlalarsen. The front end is critical for me.
My old Kef 107s seem to make anything sound very good, except poor recordings or masterings (I really don't know which). But it wasn't till I got my MF Dac that I actually considered for a moment, ditching my vinyl. Don't worry, I didn't. Whew...
I agree that room dynamics and speaker placement are crucial, but for me, I think Elizabeth is more on the ball. I've only been at this for about a year now (although I've probably crammed in 3-4 years of research), and I find that the front end is every bit as important as the final output. I operate at a lower cost level than Elizabeth, but if the front end components are all well-researched and well-matched, they can make a lot of different speakers sound very, very good. I was amazed at what my growing set-up was doing for the sound of my vinyl, but it wasn't until I got my MF Dac that I actually considered getting out of vinyl. Having said that, I think I'll hang on the Thorens and GSP reflex M, as they are not a huge outlay for quality of sound they produce.
And it's too bad that some of the recordings are so poor. I'd probably have to find some way of including some tone controls in the system if I ever want to listen to some of my older vinyl and CDs.
@markalarsen :  Amen to that. And a good Dac can sound very musical when matched with other electronics (okay ... and speakers) that have been selected for a particular sound.
And sorry, ! was away from posting for a while till support fixed a glitch in my account. It wouldn't let me post.

For tweaking validation, I do what geoffkait does, and have some fun engineering out my own solutions for: isolation, room acoustics, record/stylus cleaning etc. And i basically try all, or most of the going tweaks. But I don't spend ton of cash on it. I reserve the cash for components and music.
I'm trying to figure out, now, if a DS is imperative for streaming music. 96/192 streams sound terrible thru my MF Vink 192. No top end, no bottom end.
Cheers.

Dave  
@ronres & mdosmar: 100% agree. In my particular (or peculiar?) experiences and listening goals, I could basically invert the levels of importance that the OP has suggested, no ... decreed.

Cartridges, tonearm, phono stage, dac etc., provided most of the major changes in sound FOR MY system.