Doesn't a lot of this have to do with the nominal impedance of any given cable?
...Specifically, it is my understanding that an increased length of IC has increased impedance (as seen by the components).
If one considers that as frequency increases so does impedance this would suggest a limit to the high frequency information that could be accurately transmitted via cables with higher impedances. So length might have more to do with characteristic impedance. I understand this to be true with data cables like cat 5 – Specific impedance parameters are supposed to be critical to the speed within a computer network.
Anyone else more versed on this? Would love to get the straight goods. I often see 75ohm or 110ohm impedance cables specified or recommended for digital. I have also read that 24/96khz has different cable requirements compared to 16/44.1khz. This also makes one consider what requirements would be for even faster bit-rates such as those found in DVD & DVD-A.
...Specifically, it is my understanding that an increased length of IC has increased impedance (as seen by the components).
If one considers that as frequency increases so does impedance this would suggest a limit to the high frequency information that could be accurately transmitted via cables with higher impedances. So length might have more to do with characteristic impedance. I understand this to be true with data cables like cat 5 – Specific impedance parameters are supposed to be critical to the speed within a computer network.
Anyone else more versed on this? Would love to get the straight goods. I often see 75ohm or 110ohm impedance cables specified or recommended for digital. I have also read that 24/96khz has different cable requirements compared to 16/44.1khz. This also makes one consider what requirements would be for even faster bit-rates such as those found in DVD & DVD-A.