What is wrong with negative feedback?


I am not talking about the kind you get as a flaky seller, but as used in amplifier design. It just seems to me that a lot of amp designs advertise "zero negative feedback" as a selling point.

As I understand, NFB is a loop taken from the amplifier output and fed back into the input to keep the amp stable. This sounds like it should be a good thing. So what are the negative trade-offs involved, if any?
solman989

Showing 1 response by mlsstl

Negative feedback has been used in amps for a long time but the use got out of hand in the 1970s when the "spec wars" got going big-time. Amp designers found they could get very low distortion numbers which looked good in magazine ads.

The catch is these spectacularly low distortion numbers were measured with a static signal. Music is a dynamic, constantly changing signal. After a while, people discovered that the correlation between a very low distortion number and how the amp actually sounded in use was a bit more tenuous than first thought.

Amp design is a balance of competing factors; feedback is only one aspect of that equation. The key is to find the best overall balance for the amp in question. Using zero-feedback. when it is the subject of tunnel vision focus that ignores other parameters, is not a sole guarantee of performance any more than the mindless pursuit of super-low distortion numbers was 30 or 40 years ago.