I would make a different point about the problem with the review. I am not in the market for a low power amp or for $15,000 amp of any power. The knowledge that this is a low power amp that costs $15,000 would very likely inform my decision about whether to read the review ... I shouldn't have to read to the end of a long review to find that out. To make the point a little more sharply, suppose TAS were to publish a long and detailed amplifier review that ended with the sentence "Unfortunately, only 10 of these amplifiers were manufactured and they were all destroyed when the factory exploded." Would't you feel sort of cheated that you had read an entire review of a non-existent product?
[I guess this might be OK on April 1, but not in September.]
[I guess this might be OK on April 1, but not in September.]