Disclaimer: I too consider Lloyd to be a friend of mine as well as considering myself to be a loyal customer of his products. On Lloyd's last visit to my home he brought along an unmarked bottle of liquid and another cleaning brush, marked "4". When I inquired as to what was in the bottle, he told me it was the new "step 4 to the Prelude cleaning products". I have been using it for a few months now.
We played several LP's using the 3 step process, then used step 4 as a final rinse. I could tell a difference from the beginning. It is as if another subtle veil had been lifted from the surface, resulting in a quieter background, even reducing surface noise just a bit further.
As Lloyd will be the first to tell you: "the Devil is in the details". Each thing that adds that 1, 2 or 5% improvement in the quality of the listening experience has a cumulative effect. Five little tweaks here and there at 5% each make for a 25% improvement in what we hear.
We each need to decide for ourselves if the process is efficacious to our experience in our systems. No one can discount what someone says they are hearing or not hearing unless they have heard it in context.
There are naysayers on another thread demanding that Lloyd weigh in with his comments, but Lloyd has never been one to debate the merits of his products on Internet forums. He offers a money back guarantee to anyone who tries his products. If they don't do what they claim to do, return them for a full refund.
Prelude 4 step takes the 3 step product just that much further. Of course, now I need to go back and treat a lot of LP's with step 4!
We played several LP's using the 3 step process, then used step 4 as a final rinse. I could tell a difference from the beginning. It is as if another subtle veil had been lifted from the surface, resulting in a quieter background, even reducing surface noise just a bit further.
As Lloyd will be the first to tell you: "the Devil is in the details". Each thing that adds that 1, 2 or 5% improvement in the quality of the listening experience has a cumulative effect. Five little tweaks here and there at 5% each make for a 25% improvement in what we hear.
We each need to decide for ourselves if the process is efficacious to our experience in our systems. No one can discount what someone says they are hearing or not hearing unless they have heard it in context.
There are naysayers on another thread demanding that Lloyd weigh in with his comments, but Lloyd has never been one to debate the merits of his products on Internet forums. He offers a money back guarantee to anyone who tries his products. If they don't do what they claim to do, return them for a full refund.
Prelude 4 step takes the 3 step product just that much further. Of course, now I need to go back and treat a lot of LP's with step 4!