Vinyl vs. top-notch digital


I have never had an analogy rig. My CD player is a Meridian 800, supposedly one of the very best digital players out there. From what I've read, it appears there is a consensus in our community that a high-quality analog rig playing a good pressing will beat a top notch digital system playing a well-recorded and mastered CD. So here are my questions:

1) How much would one have to invest in analog to easily top the sound quality of the Meridian 800 (or similar quality digital player)? (Include in this the cost of a phono-capable preamp; my "preamp" right now is a Meridian 861 digital surround processor.)

2) How variable is the quality of LPs? Are even "bad" LPs still better than CD counterparts?

Thank you for any comments and guidance you can provide.
jeff_arrington

Showing 3 responses by vortrex

There is a reason why everyone says their DACs sound analog and nobody says their turntables sound digital.

You're both missing the point I guess.  I'm not talking about surface noise.  That is what it is and nobody strives to achieve that.  I'm talking about the actual reproduction of the music.  My point stands, when a DAC is really good it's described as "analog sounding" (MSB, Lampizator, Aqua, etc).  Sounding analog for a DAC is the ultimate compliment.  Sounding digital for a turntable is the ultimate insult.
@tomcy6 it’s of no concern to me what you listen to. If you want to listen to inferior digital and enjoy it then great! I don’t blame anyone for listening to this lesser format as it’s a lot cheaper and easier to manage.  I’ve been there myself trying digital but it couldn’t compare to vinyl so I ended up sticking with the best.