Vandersteen 3A,, Revel F30, or Magnepan 3.6


I'm thinking of upgrading from Vandersteen 2CEs, and have identified these three speakers as potential buys. I've heard the 3A's and thought they sounded good, but a little weak in the midrange when hearing female vocals. I did hear the Revel F50s which I loved, but they cost more than I want to spend, and the Magnepan 1.6s which sounded very transparent, but also a bit thin. My amp is the Bel Canto Evo 200.2 with 125 watts per channel and I have a tube CJ preamp. Any thoughts?
mlkiz

Showing 1 response by mikej

Hi,

I can speak from personal experience only on two of the three speakers you mention above... If you are upgrading from 2Ces then the 3A Signatures are the way to go. Compared to 3As they are simply a MUCH better speaker all around. They differ from the Magnepans in that they have a different presentation, but that's preference. They're as good as 3.6s and better than 1.6s. Price would be the determining factor for me between 3as and 3A Signatures.

One reason to keep the Vandersteens is that they will be much more room friendly. Either way, though you will want more current from your amp for the Vandies or Maggies.

Don't make a decision without listening again with your amp/pre-amp combo!

Cheers,
Mike