I have a/b compared the two, and much preferred the vandersteen 2ceSignatures. The meadowlarks are smaller and shorter which would give them a higher WAF (Wife Acceptance Factor). The 2's are great because you really can't make them sound bad. They work well with mid grade electronics too. I drove my old 2C's for years with a Denon 125watt receiver and I still think it's a pretty good sounding system. They are great for rock music with excellent power handling capabilility. If you are looking for greater detail and are willing to sacrifice bass, you should consider the magnepan 1.6's. Those are lightweight planar speakers. They are light enough that you could keep them on a wall and move them when you wanted to listen to music. The magnepans are a must listen in the 1500 range.
Vandersteen 2ce vs. Meadowlark Kestrel
I have narrowed down my speaker choices to these two model as a start in quality speakers. I want a speaker with the 1st order crossover and time coherent design. I live in an apartement right now so which speaker would be a better choice with the following factors considered: 1) can be incorporated into a smaller room apartment sized (difficult setup is a big factor) 2) biggest soundstage, dynamics, imaging and the ability to dissapperar behind the sound 3) which one will be better suited to build a future home theater around (important for my decision!) 4) running with solid state amps 5) will be adding a sub either vandersteen or rel 6) listen to most current music and movie soundtracks (jimmy buffet to van halen suit my taste) Compare the two and opinions if there happens to be another speaker brand that might be ok. The only other model I have thought about even though it is not of the same design is the PSB stratus bronze Thanks, Dillon
9 responses Add your response