Van Den Hul what is the best cart ?

''Names'' and reference. Vienna, Wenen, Bec and Wien are different

names with the same reference. Logic ''says'' whatever is true about

Wien is also true about Vienna , Wenen (Dutch) , Bec (Serbo-Crotian) . 

Van den Hul seems to refer to the person Van den Hul. This however

does not mean that all cartridges ''Van den Hul'' are made by him.

So how can one know if an ''Van den Hul'' is made by him or by one

of his employee? The circumstance that so many are offered second

hand may suggest  some answer. 

mijostyn, capability seems not to be ''age dependant''. According to my

information Van den Hul is still ''going strong'' . Think also about ''late''

Ikeda and Takeda. You seem to be an master in wrong assertions.

Psychology is not relevant for ''truth values''. Statements of beliefs

or hopes  ''resist logical analysis''. 

mijostin, The problem is that  everybody like to generalize. For this aim

the universal quantifier  ''all'' is used. The formula is

For all x Fx&Gx .  But if one x does not satisfy conditions F and G the

whole statement is not true.The most people have no idea what ''all''

means. It is not a name which can be put in ''subject place'' in an

sentence.

Dramatic  example is decision of European commission to decalar that

''all immigrants  have the right to asylum procedure'' .

This means that they had no idea what ''all'' means.That is to say ''how

many those all are'', The kids from 12 and on from all countries in

Africa and middle East who know in advice that they will never get asylum 

come to Europe wihch was their primary intention. Without any asylum

procedure they moved (walking) to the North Europe. Some countries

were willing to accept limited number , some not a single one. The result

is that all countries have much more ''illegal immigrants'' than ''legal'' .

Legal are those who are in asylum procedure. The illegal kind can't

be returned to their country because they countries refuse to accept

them. This whole drama is caused because the members of European

commission had no idea what ''ALL'' means.