I just came across this thread, interesting no one has commented yet. In general, I have found in my research the following things:
try to use a converter that utilizes two clocks, one for each "family" of sampling frequencies, 44.1kHz and 48kHz. This avoids "clock synthesis," which can cause jitter.
galvanic isolation from the computer's power source is good, this is why so many converters are battery driven or come with wall warts.
There are several techniques to measure jitter, some of which actually cause jitter, so going by specs is risky. There are also several different types of jitter, as you saw on the audiophilleo site, and these can be measured at different points along the signal path, producing different results. Jitter measurements posted by manufacturers can be misleading.
Jitter sounds like high frequency noise, so I've read. I use a Vlink into a PS Audio DL III, and I think the music sounds too bright, so I'm either going to upgrade the speakers or the converter. Haven't decided.
try to use a converter that utilizes two clocks, one for each "family" of sampling frequencies, 44.1kHz and 48kHz. This avoids "clock synthesis," which can cause jitter.
galvanic isolation from the computer's power source is good, this is why so many converters are battery driven or come with wall warts.
There are several techniques to measure jitter, some of which actually cause jitter, so going by specs is risky. There are also several different types of jitter, as you saw on the audiophilleo site, and these can be measured at different points along the signal path, producing different results. Jitter measurements posted by manufacturers can be misleading.
Jitter sounds like high frequency noise, so I've read. I use a Vlink into a PS Audio DL III, and I think the music sounds too bright, so I'm either going to upgrade the speakers or the converter. Haven't decided.