Tympani IVa amping


Any advice? I'm quite overwhelmed with info recently but am leaning towards Cary CAD-500's. Any input greatly appreciated.
casimirm
You will need power.These were originally designed around the ARC line of products.
Casimim

I have Tympani IVa's and I am using a Mark Levinson 23.5 with good results.

This was recommended "off the record" by a source at the factory who said it was the best amp he ever heard with Tympanis.

True they can handle just about as much power as you want to throw at them, and some Magnepan gurus suggest that biamping is really the best way to go.

Good luck and have fun.
IMO, cctive bi-amping or even triamping is the best way to go. I use tube otl's on top and a class D amp for the bass panels. Crossover duties are now being handled by a behringer 2496.

Cwlondon's placement of the bass panels is interesting. Care to explain the logic and results? Thanks.
Swo2601

I am still experimenting, but here are a few thoughts:

I have owned Magneplanars off and on since 1980, and historically thought I achieved the most spacious imaging by keeping the panels on a horizontal line and not canting the panels.

With the Tympanis, however, you can see in my photos that I have canted the mid/tweeter panels in somewhat agressively, while listening about 8 feet away.

To my ear, the imaging is not as wide or spacious, but sounds more focused, more solid, less diffuse, where vocals in particular have a dead center, uncanny presence.

When I was having them restored, circa 2000, the factory suggested the placement of the bass panels was not very critical.

In my experience, you can boost the bass a bit with Magnepans by moving the panels closer to the rear wall and/or corners, which was the main variable that informed my current set up. There is a significant difference in +/- only 6 inches.

I have folded them slightly to mainly make the room feel just a bit more spacious. This doesn't seem to make a huge difference.

I have experimented with all three panels on one continuous line which perhaps sounded a bit better, but is a bit harder to live with.

cwlondon
Intersting. Thanks for your thoughts on placement. I have Tympani 4's. I've als had Tympani 3b's and 1 d's. As you know the recommended crossover point for the bass panels is 250 Hz, which is clearly audible. Nevertheless, I guess I would have to agree somewhat that bass panel positioning is not that critical. My question is whether it can be placed to contribute to a deeper soundstage on the tympanis. If the tymps could image better, that would make me sincerely happy. The wall of sound is nice, but . . .