2. analog
  3. 139470-76532

Tonearms: Ripoff?

If you search for tonearm recommendations you'll find an overwhelming amount of praise for $1k and less products. Audiomods and Jelco are the two most mentioned.

The Audiomods is just some guy making Rega-based tonearms in a workshop. Just some guy is putting out tonearms that compete with tonearms that cost many times the price -- from the likes of SME, Clearaudio, VPI, Graham, etc.

So the question is -- are tonearms just a scam? How is it that everyone loves Audiomods and Jelco to death and never talks about / dismisses high end tonearms? Is it because there's no real difference between one of these low-cost tonearms and the high end ones? Is an Audiomods Series V ** really ** the equivalent of a SME V? Some guy in a workshop equals the famed precision of SME? Is that once you have the math and materials worked out all tonearms are essentially the same? Or is it that most owners of record players online are dumpster-diving for vintage gear and simply can't afford to listen to better?

So, what's going on?
madavid0

Showing 3 responses by sfischer1

sfischer1's avatar
sfischer1
56 posts
 
There is no rational basis for extraordinarily expensive anything. Such items may be scarce, have attention to detail, materials and performance lavished on them but cannot be rationally justified if an individual cannot afford them. Is a Ferrari inherently better than a Porsche? Arguments can be made from multiple perspectives. It was argued that the 100K home and Ford truck wouldn’t provide the same joy. For who? It is said that Sam Walton drove an old pickup and lived in a modest lifetime home, but had a personal jet to get him to his stores scattered across the country. For those who can afford them and want them, they will make a subjective decision. 
sfischer1's avatar
sfischer1
56 posts
 
A sort of statement I often encounter in Absolute Sound, and Stereophile reviews is the declaration of an expensive item's (20K turntable) great sound/performance but then compared to a 75K item (tonearm) which is appreciated as better, and the difference explained by virtue of the 3x price difference.  This is absurd. the 75K tonearm costs that because that is what it will take for the business to be worthwhile.  There is no mass production based price to materials/overhead cost ratio that applies.  Instead there is a business gross revenue to materials/overhead cost ratio.  If you can inspire customers, you're in business.
sfischer1's avatar
sfischer1
56 posts
 
clearthink, As an example, and as a recovered watch addict, people don’t justify expensive watches based on their time-keeping accuracy (rational), and the differences between different high-quality products can be described as minor. While the features of luxury products can be objective, they may not be practical or necessary, and it often comes down to the subjective outside of what is needed beyond food, clothing, and shelter stability. I can identify all sorts of objective improvements in performance and quality of my Bergmann turntable, but to my wife and most people, they aren’t rational. I have it, and those improvements matter because I want it.
More to discover