To re-cap or not to re-cap? That is the question


I've got some very fine 1980s vintage equipment I love and don't want to replace. Recently, I was able to locate a company that repaired the drivers in my ailing speakers; I'd auditioned half a dozen excellent speakers in my home in anticipation of needing to replace my Teslas, and none pleased me as much. The amplifier has been serviced by a local audio engineer I trust--but he describes himself as a "recovering audiophile," and may not be the right person to ask what I want to ask here. Namely: should I have the capacitors in the amp, and perhaps also in the speakers' crossovers, replaced? Is there any other service protocol I should consider?

On the principle "don't fix it if it ain't broke," I'm inclined to leave well enough alone. I don't notice any audible deficit. But perhaps the system could sound even better?

Your sage advice will be appreciated.
snilf

Showing 1 response by elliottbnewcombjr

Well now,

I have had a resistor or three replaced over the years, never anything more than that. Always checked out by pro when that was done.

Still, I always consider 'fixing' or 'upgrading' my vintage stuff, most from 1950's and 60's.

Problem is, they still sound great, they still are dead quiet.

I'm thinking, for my 75th Bday, I might have my McIntosh mx110z 'overhauled'. 

Yet, it sounds so damn good, I worry it might actually lose something.

Conclusion is always as you said, If it ain't broke, I ain't fixing it.