Tidal digital hi-fi vs records

@noromance , putting aside the vinyl/digital debate, there could be other reasons for a difference in SQ. Consider the quality of your components, is your analogue rig better than your streamer? 
Also, I've noticed that some songs on Tidal don't sound very good, and there's no way to know if the track was originally mastered in hires or upsampled from 16/44.1.

And the Harvest release should sound better since it was an original flat transfer. Vinyl or digital, flat transfers with original mastering sound better than the compressed stuff.

What album are we talking about?

@cleeds , 
Using a direct copy of the analogue master to produce CDs. Minimal compression during the A to D process, no remastering, no additional EQ added.
I'm referring to the mastering and transferring to media before the Loudness Wars.

I believe the OP is comparing an analogue mastered vinyl pressing vs. a digital remaster on vinyl vs. a digitally remastered file via Tidal.
I should have used the word digital instead of CD.
This is why I asked which album he is referring to. I only know it’s on the Harvest label.

Of course, the pressing plants are not using the original master, but typically a first generation dub. I can only assume the OP is playing music which was originally from an analogue source.
And yes, the amount of compression at this final stage
would vary between facilities as well as the variation in cutting.