Thiel CS 1.5 vs Small Martin Logan?


I've never tried ML speakers and I'm curious about the smaller models, like Aerius-i. My listening room isn't big and unfortunately I cannot move the speakers more than 3-feet from the back wall or 1.5-feet from the left wall. I like my Thiel CS 1.5's that I've owned for 7 years and they are a good match for my 70w/ch tube amp.

1) In general how do the smaller ML speakers sound compared to the small Thiel CS 1.5's? I ask this question with the assumption that both speakers are being driven by a hefty solid-state amp and not starved for power. How's the ML bass since the panel is integrated with a powered sub-woofer, right? Is ML room placement super critical?

2) I know that my Thiel CS 1.5's sound surprisingly good with my modest 70w/ch tube amp. Thiels are supposedly current hungry speakers but the small 1.5's aren't that difficult. The bass is decent but not huge. Will the smaller ML's sound decent with a modest amount of tube power?
abecollins

Showing 1 response by pmwoodward

Hi Abe, I've never been able to compare the Thiel's to the ML, but I own both the SL3's and the CLS. I think that you will find that the ML are rather placement sensitive. small changes can make large performance differances. I find 4 feet out from the back wall to work well in my room. although I have not tried tube amps with them, I understand they love tube amps. most of the newer ML models are fairly efficient and should do well with modest tube power. keep in mind that most ML speakers are 4 ohms and at times go down to 2 ohms. many amps, both tube and SS aren't happy doing so. another note is that ML have what I would consider to be seperate woofers not sub-woofers. their smaller models are reasonably flat down to about 35Hz. hope this helps. Paul