I have a gen va with the 24/96 mod. My experiences have been that no active preamp sounds better compared to a passive pre setup correctly, short cable runs and such. When comparing active preamps, they added their own sense of dynamics and harmonics. These never seemed to improve on the dynamics and hormonics of the gen. va. They would also often remove info and degrade the soundstage. I now have installed 40pt stepped attunuators inside cary 805c with the gen va. going straight in the input. This has allowed the Gen. va to show what it can do. The soundstage is big, the harmonics are great, and the detail is all there without being hyper. I wonder if this is due to the lack of another gainstage that is not needed in my situation. The cary only needs 1 volt for full output. I have had the same experiences with the gen. in other systems. A melos sha-gold with both an active and passive output sounded better in passive where the attenuator was between 11 and 1. It seems that spending all the money for the gen. one should utilize it. To pad down the gain and then add another gain stage sounds like a crime. melos, audio research or any other did not improve the sound of a dirty old noble volume pot in a passive device with my gen v,let alone a good attenuator device. Those are two dog on Roger Waters amused to death and if I knew dogs better, I could tell you their breeds. Redkiwi, I also seem to find between 11 and 1 to give best sound when using active devices and now you have told me why, thanks! 1953, effortless does decribe a gen. v with a passive device. The music just flows effortlessly.