Theory about Cary amps and their reviewers


Cary is now one of the older tube companies around from the tube boom in the'90s. My experience with them has been very positive. I wonder if some of the criticisms of them - fat, not extended, slow, etc., are in fact relics of the first reviews in magazines which were so used to solid state and still in the "wattage race". I have heard Rockets and V12's in rock and home theater setting pulling duty that would put solid states to shame. I also notice you never really see those sorts of reviews anymore. Other than making the amps compatable with higher gain devices, so that they can have direct inputs from things like CD's with volume controls, have there been any fundamental changes though? I prefer the slightly older versions with the lower gain input myself, but I understand the rationale.
biomimetic

Showing 1 response by mikirob

I really get a kick out of all the "audiophile" arguing as above. Music is personal. What you like I may not...what floats my boat you may hate...I own a Cary V12 and love it, have owned it for 10 years. To my ears it sounds like music. I am a musician; but that does't make my taste in sound better than yours. I also own a Cary 300SEI as well as a Golden Tube 300B. I love each unit in different ways. Cary has been extremely reliable, not a single problem, ever. I have owned a number of SS amps, generally I am not a fan, rather dislike most SS. Criticism like "Tubey warm, etc., just makes me smile...it's what I like, to me most SS is hard, unnatural, no dimension, thin, sterile, unlike real music; but like I said that
is my bias...