The Mhdt lab Balanced Pagoda DAC


In the last couple of months I have received numerous Emails from readers regarding could I fine a truly balanced R2R DAC that would sell for less then $2,500 to review. Since, I am a fan of the very reasonably priced, but very well built and terrific sounding DACs from Mhdt Lab I requested from the them the Balanced Pagoda model that retails for less then $2,000. In the past I have reviewed the Orchid DAC and found it to be a superlative music maker, raved about it and thought it was a great bargain at it’s price point of $1,200. Take a look at the threads here on AudioGon, where the DIY/modders have shared how they improved the performance of the standard Orchid to a higher level.

The Balanced Pagoda uses four, two per channel, highly regarded NOS Burr Brown PCM 1704-J grade chips. Of course all circuity is doubled and it uses a pair of NOS WE 396 tubes in the analog conversation section, compared to the Orchid’s single tube.

If you run a balanced system and are looking for a "honey" of a DAC, the Balanced Pagoda might be the DAC you are looking for because of its performance vs cost ratio. It takes the beautiful tonality, 3D imaging, wonderful air around instruments of the Orchid to a higher level and adds more transparency/micro-details, with dramatically more powerful overall dynamics/ bass extension. Yet it never becomes analytical in its presentation and draws you into the music.

There are two caveats to be mindful of to get the magic out of the Balanced Pagoda: 1) Drive it with an AES/EBU balanced cable. 2) Only use the XLR outputs. Otherwise you will lose the ultimate performance of this DAC in your system.

I’ll be writing for the Stereo Times website the full review with all the details about the Balanced Pagoda in the next couple of months. For now, this "heads up" hopefully provides to the individuals that were seeking a balanced DAC in this price range enough details to seek out an audition of this excellent performer.

teajay
First: To answer arafiq's questions. 

1) If you can't run the Balanced Pagoda, balanced it will not give you its best performance.
2) I have reviewed both the Orchid and the Tubadour III SE. If you can afford the up charge of $1000 for the Audio Mirror piece its worth it. You get subtle, but real increments of improvement compared to the Orchid. However, the Orchid does not "wilt" in comparison.

3) If you run the Balanced Pagoda balanced, in my opinion, its at least as good if not slightly better then the Tubadour III SE for about $400 less.

Just had a guest listener who brought his DAC over to compare to the Balanced Pagoda. He wanted to purchase it, it's on loan for the reviewing process, because how much he loved its performance and did not want to go back to his DAC in his system!
@ronrags  While the Orchid can accept an input of 24/192, for analog output purposes its chip only uses the first 16 bits of a 24-bit file. If you want to output all 24 bits, you will have to move up to the Pagoda.
@ozzy62  Thanks for your feedback. The difference between an Orchid and Pagoda is not much. I'm definitely leaning toward a Pagoda at this time. Do you mind sharing what modifications were made to your unit?
I went to Teajay to listen to Tekton ps12 with my friend, we were treated with respect, and serve with good music on both of his system.i end up buying the ps 12,Teajay is not influencer, He likes to pass information for friends and readers. Jane you should meet Him, He is a very fun , and too nice....He has a big big house, He has a very good job.
@teajay My apologies for not acknowledging your answers earlier. Somehow, I missed it completely. Just read them, thank you.

So the dilemma I'm facing is choosing between the Orchid and Pagoda (unbalanced). On the one hand, the Pagoda can output hi-res, but I've also heard that the Pagoda loses some of the magic of the Orchid. Since you're the only one, at least here at Audiogon, who has listened to and reviewed both, I want to ask if there's any truth to it. If we take the price difference out of the equation, which one would you choose?


Hey arafiq,

No worries.

Since, I don’t care about handling hi-res formats-only care about Redbook, and have validated for myself that if you drive the Balanced Pagoda single-ended you take away some of it’s "magical" performance. Driven single-ended, both in/out it still is at least as good as the Orchid and better if driven balanced. Therefore, I would go with the Balanced Pagoda, if price is not part of the equation. Remember, this is all based on the Orchid compared to the Balanced Pagoda, not the single-ended Pagoda in my system. But, the logic of the above stated conclusion should be valid. If I’m correct the price of the standard Pagoda and the Orchid is almost the same. Orchid if run single-ended, not the standard Pagoda and if you are going to run the DAC in your system balanced then the Balanced Pagoda.
@teajay  Thank you for the quick response. Much appreciated. Please forgive my ignorance, but in my case since I'm using Cronus Magnum 2 as my integrated amp, does it make sense to buy the balanced Pagoda?

@teajay Any news on your review of the balanced Pagoda? I have not seen it or have I missed it? Best regards from Sweden
/Simon

Hi guys just a quick question. Which MHDT has most bottom end? I guess the choice of tube can help too.

Hi. I realize I am late to the thread,

I just received a Pagoda Balanced DAC & enjoy it very much.

I am running Western Electric 396a tubes.

I was curious about the lettering beneath the Name Pagoda on the face plate.

It appears to be Baxauxsd. Anyone know what this means??