The Harbeth phenomenon


In my search for a new pair of speakers, I've gone through many threads here and noticed that many owners or fans of Harbeth have almost a love-like connection with Harbeth speakers. It is almost as if the speakers cast a spell upon them. I know many audiophiles love their speakers but Harbeth owners seem especially enamored with theirs. I am extremely puzzled by this phenomenon because on paper Harbeth speakers look average at best and lack many of the attributes that generally make a great speaker.

Their sensitivity of generally around the 86dB mark makes them rather inefficient and therefore, at least in theory, not a good match for many lower powered tube amps, or any amps below 100wpc. Their frequency range is simply inferior to most high-end speakers since they don't go below 40 Hz. This alone should, again at least in theory, disqualify Harbeth speakers from consideration as top high end speakers. And yet I've never heard anyone complain about their bass, while people complain about lack of bass in the Gibbon Nines from DeVore, which is a fantastic speaker. Their cabinets look like a cheap DIY enclosure (disclaimer: I've never seen a Harbeth up close, only pictures). The 7ES-3 is rated B-Restricted, while the smaller and cheaper Usher Be-718 A-Restricted in Stereophile but garners nowhere near the same amount of admiration, praise and following among audiophiles.

So what's going on here? Is this a big conspiracy plot by the company that paid off a few hundred of people to infiltrate audiophile internet forums and a few reviewers? I am of course joking here, but the question is serious. How can speakers so average on paper be so good in real life? I know the opposite is often true, but you rarely see this phenomenon.

Please speak up.
actusreus
Owned and heard a lot of the big names in transducers. Wilson, Martin Logan, Magnepan, Dynaudio, Krell, B&W, Avalon, Totem, Monitor Audio, JBL, Kef, Quad, Dunlavy .... and the original midrange magic bookshelf speaker, the Bozak B313. As for the Harberth’s...well, they stand out as the most pedestrian sounding speakers I’ve listened to. Boxy, flat and vague. If they were inexpensive and easy to drive I’d say go for it, but for the price to performance they offer it’s a definite no.
What the Harbeths do well, they do *really* well. It's all about that midrange magic. Human voices and acoustic instruments are their bread and butter. And they absolutely excel at tone and timbre. I bought my Harbeth M30s from @petek and I had the privilege of listening to his Verity Parsifals. Cost no object, I would own a pair of Parsifals in addition to the Harbeths. No question about it. Of course, cost is an object for many of us, and Harbeth is a pretty darned good place to get off the hifi merry-go-round. Speaking for myself, you all are going to have to pry my Harbeths from my cold dead hands. :-)
Maybe it’s just me but Harbeth speakers sound slow. Probably not a big deal for acoustic or Diana Krall, but I find it to be an issue with faster music. 


Seanheis1--I love Harbeth's but agree with you, they are not the most dynamic or agile speakers. That's why I moved to Daedalus--the accurate tone and midrange purity of Harbeth with greater speed and dynamic capability.