The future of preamps


I still use one, but I wonder if their days are numbered. To those who have removed the preamp from their system, have there been any regrets? Anyone gone back to using a preamp after having removed it?
psag

Showing 2 responses by psag

I agree that phonostages are here to stay. But it seems to me that digital sources with volume control, and various types of all-in-one products (including integrated amps) could marginalize the role of the preamp. The loss of transparency introduced by the preamp needs to be counterbalanced by other sonic benefits. Otherwise, the preamp is little more than a fancy switchbox.
When I started this thread, I wasn't thinking about the relative merits of passive and active preamps. I was thinking more about digital sources with volume control, integrated amps, and amps with digital inputs, all as ways of eliminating the preamp box entirely. However, all the discussion on active versus passive has certainly been interesting.

I use a tube preamp going directly to a digital signal processor. So there are extra a-d and d-a conversion steps in the processor. When I remove the analogue preamp, resolution and transparency go up slightly, but the sound becomes thin and uninvolving.

I've read Atmasphere's comments in the past regarding control of interconnect cables. Although I clearly hear differences in my system made by different balanced cables, I suppose that this could be due to the inability of my front end components to adequately control the cables. It seems to me that this could be true. Mind-boggling, to think that the entire high end interconnect industry could be based on this!