2. misc-audio
  3. 1344820820

The color of audio and ambassadorship

Lately I've been trying to be an embassador of hi-end. I fear high quality music is a dying breed with the advent of MP3's and the like. So i try to sway those who can be swayed to begin their journeys into high end audio reproduction.

When speaking to friends about music I usually ask if they have ever heard their favorite music on a hi end system. To which almost all say no, and then ask why. A fair question. I usually say something on the order of "if you havnt heard your music on a high end system then you really havn't heard your music." This bait usually gets them over so they can hear what I'm talking about. And indeed to the uninitiated, even a simple system such as mine can be quite eye opening. It was for me 20 years ago when I heard a hi end system the first time! When they ask how much it costs however, well, that's another reaction altogether. Usually I get a WTF, or "its not that important to me!" And then they ask why is it so expensive?

This is where the audiophile has to try and explain what makes good sound and how the equipment contributes to the experience. I usually try to explain it terms of high resolution photography. I try to compare a low resolution photograph taken from a cheap camera. The picture will be blurry, the colors not as distinct, and the gradations not as varied when comparing the same photo taken with a professional camera. I say both pictures will give you an image you understand, but one will be closer to lifelike. Most people then get it.

If the conversation continues and they are more interested I my talk about system synergy. This is a little bit more difficult, but they way I try to explain this is I say what most try to achieve is some form of neutrality. To this end I say let's equate neutrality to gray. A perfect middle gray, a blend of 100% white and 100% black. Each component then is a shade of gray. In a perfect system each component is a perfect middle gray. However, we know that's not the case. Some might be lighter, some darker grays. Thus to achieve a perfect middle gray, one might have a dark gray speaker that needs a light gray amp. The more equipment, the harder it is to blend the colors and achive a perfect middle gray. Thus the audiophile sickness. These are analogies of course, and it can even be taken further when you bring in transparency and texture of music, but most people can be made to understand the concept, if not the madness that goes along with it.

How do you try to be an ambassador to hi end? Or do you even try
last_lemming

Showing 1 response by realremo

realremo
460 posts
 
I have shown people the difference in sound quality between .mp3 and lossless on my system. Everyone accepts that lossless sounds better, but I have only convinced one person to start ripping lossless files instead of .mp3s. Most only hear the differences if I point them out, and even if they can hear them without my help, they don't really care. The trade-off of file-size to sound quality is not good enough. Also, the instantaneous gratification of online .mp3 purchases is huge, and no one wants to deal with the shiny metal discs once the music is ripped.

Almost everyone is surprised at how good my system sounds, compared to their typical listening experience. "It sounds so clear!" I get that a lot. But usually there is some random quality about my mid-fi system's sound that bothers them. It is too detailed, or there is not enough big-booty bass. Pretty much everyone agrees that the cost is not worth it. Most people's jaws drop. My own wife has no idea what the total cost is, and I really haven't spent that much, compared to most.

Another issue I have is convincing anyone to sit in front of a stereo system and just have a few drinks and listen to music. Those who do venture into the listening room usually get antsy and/or bored within 10-15 minutes, and most people won't even bother. A great big screen in front of the seating position is apparently too much of a feature to omit.
More to discover