The best sounding FM Tuner is.....


OK Magnum Dynalab, Fanfare, Day Sequerra, etc. owners...I have no "high end" dealer in my area that carries a great tuner. I probably will not have the chance to listen to or 'a/b' compare a tuner before I decide to purchase. I'm asking anyone with comparison experience or anyone that feels that the own the best to respond in this discussion. Thanks, I look forward to reading your responses!
jaguar

Showing 4 responses by ferrari

Price/Performance ratio at about $200.00 used,I would pick the Yamaha T 1 or the Sumo Charlie,and for a third choice the venerable NAD 4020A.To do better than these will have to spend a lot more,for performance that is for the most part only marginaly better.
Sedond. The radio stations in this area are pure crap and the few NPR stations here are not of the music variety.

As for XM it is a god send for me and have not had any sonic or operational issues with it. It comes in totally clear with great separation, and have not found it shrill,compressed or grainy.

Wish we had a decent NPR station near here. I had a great one in the Denver area that I now miss. Believe me if the Polk XRT 12 and the XM broadcast did not deliver as they do, I would just give up on broadcast alltogether. But thus far for me XM delivers.
Since this thread began in 1999, we have flogged this to death. In the 48 years of this hobby have had damn near every tuner through here tube or solid state.

No other component you will add to a system is more dependent on an outside source than a tuner analog or digital. Much of its performance is dependent on signal transmitted.Environment signal is transmitted through. From there it becomes the antenna used. I have never found an inside antenna to have the performance of a good outside antenna. Then comes into play the tuner itself. there is a wealth of good used tuners on the market. But any 20 year plus tuner is going to need some work, just nature of the beast, be it analog or digital.

With the vast majority of radio stations now owned by a handful of corporate enitities such as Pilot and Clear Channel and others of that ilk, this almost becomes a moot point. Signals from FM these days do not have the strength they once had, when many of these stations were independents. Programming is for the most part dreadful.

As for me I have gone to the Polk XRT 12 XM radio tuner and have solved my problem. Great music, no commercials, and the antenna problem no longer exists for me and at the paltry sum of .43 cents a day for the monthly subscriptions I get the music I want to hear as well as a lot of other great music,news and sports, I would otherwise miss with an AM/FM convential tuner. And the good thing is the Polk XRT 12 Tuner looks like a system component and fits right in with the other gear in the rack.

And as of this post date, Crown has released a home XM Radio tuner.
If I had decent stations around here, would not have gone the XM route as their would be no need to. However that is far from the case here. I find more tham acceptable for my needs, whether or not it is hi-rez or not, is a moot point for me. It gets the music I want to hear, when I want to hear it and sans the commercials and offers excellent taping of the air. I am not concerned in regards to my system or other members system. I find it fits my needs quite nicely and at 63 now, who cares what others think, it is not a remote concern of mine.

My point in offering the XM solution, was simple, if other members have less than stellar FM in their area. The Polk XRT 12 XM is a solid alternative. Beyond that, C'est le Vie.