It was Harman Kardon back in the 70's who was touting the audible effects of inaudible frequencies. They claimed that their ultra wide-band receivers, preamps, and amps (4Hz to 140kHz) would outperform the competitor products (typically 20Hz to 20,000kHz) even though they were outside the range of human hearing. They didn't compare a competitor's product against their unit, rather they built (2) identical units and limited the bandwidth on one to the 20-20 range. Supposedly over 80% of the professionals they played them for identified the wider bandwidth as more musical. Harman Kardon's explanation was that inaudible frequencies produce harmonics in the audible range.
Test Equipment vs The Ear
Just posted this link in another thread,
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Sound/earsens.html
Could the ear actually be superior to test equipment?
What do you think?
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Sound/earsens.html
Could the ear actually be superior to test equipment?
What do you think?