@ lancelock,
How are you using the MZ2 with the AHB2 considering the MZ2 has RCA out only and the AHB2 has XLR in only?
Thank you.
How are you using the MZ2 with the AHB2 considering the MZ2 has RCA out only and the AHB2 has XLR in only?
Thank you.
Tekton Double Impacts
@ Charles1dad & mac48025,
I truly appreciate your feedback on the LTA MZ2-S and the CSL comparison. I have the CSL and the Melody P2688 (also based on the 101D tube) on my want list. I was hoping the MZ2-S would equal or better the CSL so that I can save some money. I guess if one has a small budget, the MZ2-S is no brainer, however, if one wants something higher, the CSL should be considered. The Lyngdorf TDAI-2170 has also piqued my interest and I have to find a way to audition one. Thank you. |
mac48025, I have no doubt the CSL/Frankenstein combo is quite special. Hopefully, you are able to find a preamp/amp combo you can live with on perpetual basis. Charles1dad, I don't know how I could get the CSL/P2688 to audition side by side. I want to see what the others say about the Lyngdorf and go from there as it might save me some money. |
The Yggy and the DS are both good sounding DAC’s; however,
the topology is different for both. With
different rooms, different systems and different EARS, people will assess the
sound differently. We all hear differently,
and even if both are compared in the same system, some will prefer one over the
other.
|
+Charles1dad. You demonstrate wisdom in your writing's that I enjoy reading from you. Sometimes we forget that what we hear is subjective at best, and regardless of how much a component costs, someone would always prefer something of a lesser value based on sound alone. We all hear differently. Tekton is making dreams come through for some of us who want high-end sound for far less. BRAVO Tekton!! |
@mac48025, Why are you holding on to your DI's?? Some of us want more bang for our buck, and are waiting for people to offload their DI's when they upgrade/ climb up the Tekton ladder. Charles: I think people expect not only better sound but coupled with better/quality drivers at certain price points. After all, that's what was mentioned earlier on. I also understand that some don't care for looks either. You can make coffin speakers with dead bodies in them. As long as the dead body can sing to their liking, that is all that matters to them. I am not saying the Tekton's are ugly but I would love to see some improvements there as well. |
+1 Jetter, You beat me to it. I was waiting for the SE version myself and thought the price as well as the parts used should align with my $$$, and not just the sound, considering it is priced twice as much as the standard SE. The explanation doesn't make sense to me as well. If I am a speaker designer and want to copy it, I would just buy a pair, take them apart to capture as much as I can and resell it or something. Perhaps the enclosure should be made such that no one can open it to peek at the parts used - now that would make more sense. |
The explanation given by Tekton makes it seem like the drivers used in the SE's or his designs play a "major" role than his patent. Why write a white paper on that patent but won't disclose drivers used in his speakers. Are the drivers more important than his patent that renders all speakers obsolete? Even Magico with expensive custom in-house drivers do disclose their drivers as well as some of the materials used in designing them. |
Grannyring, Thanks a lot for your feedback!! I have followed you and Charles (charles1dad) for a very long time, and I value your opinions greatly. You both call a spade a spade, so I price your feedback on audio gear very high. While we can all argue that performance on a component can't solely be judged on the cost, any sensible person knows that quality parts and implementation plays a major part. I have interest in the Tekton SEs and still do. I expected quality drivers but you saw the designers response. It appears to him that all that matters is the sound, and that there was/is no need for people to ask for the drivers used because the sound alone answers it all. Your quote " Let’s just say Tekton needs additional talent and help moving forward if they want to achieve sustainable success" is spot on. Tekton is doing something great for us audiophiles in that he is bringing affordable speakers with great sound to us, but he need to be open to criticism on improvements. Also, how he responds to the critics is very important as his personality/ego could show in his responses. As a designer/manufacturer/owner of a company/seller, how he treats customers, whether good or bad, will decide his fate in this business going forward. |
@Teejay, "There are at least three professional reviewers who have shared to me that they "are eating crow" because when they first read my review on the DI's they thought I was on the take or drinking laced Kool-Aid to say they were better then the Cello's, until they got to hear them with their own ears. All had reviewed or owned speakers above the 20K price range and admitted the DI's were at least as good or better then the much more expensive speakers". Are these three reviewers reviewing the DI's for publication? Are they members on Audiogon? Can they post here? It would be nice to hear from the horse's mouth, so they can share their direct experience along with the speakers they compared the DI's to. |
Hey Teajay, Something I have noticed about you on this thread is that you seem to have issues with what some people are feeding their DIs with, especially those that say something negative about the DI sound. While I agree that you may be right in some situations, I think questioning what Grannyring is feeding his DIs is not right. This man has owned very nice/expensive gear and sold them for the Lyngdorf that he likes so much. With his experience and ears, wouldn’t he know the sound he is after, and know if the Lyngdorf is not playing well with he DIs? |
Teajay, I have not heard the DI's or any Tekton speakers, and I have NEVER commented about a direct experience with any Tekton speakers. If you read my posts, you too will know that I mentioned I am interested in the SEs - I really do. I live in Colorado but I wasn't able to make it to RMAF due to work and family issues (I had to care for a sick child while wife is at work). On the other hand, I think the Lyngdorf is very good and should be for the DI. |
@greg22lz I am not sure if you understand grannyring's point. He is only pointing out that people should expect to hear different sound opinions from others based on the frequent changes to parts on the DI speakers. While you seem to have a problem with Bill's scrutiny, which came about because he chose to mod his, we should be grateful and lucky to know this, so that we don't blame people's upstream components so much like it has happened on this thread, when someone complains about what they hear with the DI's. For me, I just want this speaker manufacturer to succeed in that he is bringing stellar and affordable speakers to the market. However, I hope he takes this in a positive way, and perhaps allow more time on newer designs, and to settle on parts/ sound before launching them. |
@greg22lz, But Bill was NOT putting down the DIs other than making people aware to accept other opinions regarding sound since there are variants of these speakers with different parts. Is that a bad thing for him to say? Most of us or posters on this thread are here because of a GOOD thing: great sounding speakers for less $$$. Does that mean some can’t pass on meaningful/useful information to others here or make constructive criticism about the speakers? |
@greg22lz, It’s all good. @mac48025, I agree. And please share your experience with the SE’s when you receive them. |