Technics SL-1700 feet

I agree with chakster reg. ''standard Technics footers'': worthless.
I substituted those with AT 636 footers under my Obsidian plinth
and SP 10,mk2 . I assume that chakster' s are bigger but not
necessary  better. Anyway both are excellent. 
.

Dear chakster, I am very, very sorry to have insulted your (much
bigger) footers, But your story remind me of this guy who wanted
to impress his friend with his new swimming pool. ''End what is
your impression?'' he asked. ''Well , uch, what should I say; is
the 3x 3 m. not to small"?
The guy was very angry: ''You idiot the pool is 25 m deep''. 
Aka: your footers can support 60 kg each while your TT is 20 (?)
kg. heavy. My SP 10 is even lighter. 

Dear chakster , ''better than… relation'' can be endless , The
formula is R( a, b, c,... n). I was very glad to find the AT-636 
in order to substitute for the ''worthless'' original footers under
my Obsidian plinth. I am convinced that the sceptical review 
of the SP-10,mk2 with Obsidian plinth  was caused by those
worthless footers. I forget the price but those were not cheap.
Anyway  I don't need ''better kind''.