further thoughts on the source:
i see two problems with the speaker, namely the panel itself and the crossover point.
the panel is the second generation electrostatic technology.
it is more resolving than earlier ml panels, such as the cls's, sequels, and quests.
i heard a quest last night. it was very unforgibing of poor recordings. the new panels are even more revealing and detailed. be careful to provide a "gentle" signal or , you may get a headache.
the woofer crosses over at a a frequency in the midrange. integration between panel and cone could be a problem. i would suggest bringing cds with kick drum, male and female voice , etc., to test the integration.
i am looking for a new speaker. i was considering the new clx. after hearing the quest, i feel the panel is too unforgiving for me.
i see two problems with the speaker, namely the panel itself and the crossover point.
the panel is the second generation electrostatic technology.
it is more resolving than earlier ml panels, such as the cls's, sequels, and quests.
i heard a quest last night. it was very unforgibing of poor recordings. the new panels are even more revealing and detailed. be careful to provide a "gentle" signal or , you may get a headache.
the woofer crosses over at a a frequency in the midrange. integration between panel and cone could be a problem. i would suggest bringing cds with kick drum, male and female voice , etc., to test the integration.
i am looking for a new speaker. i was considering the new clx. after hearing the quest, i feel the panel is too unforgiving for me.