tangential answers to specific questions on the forum


OK, so here's a general question.

My observation has been that specific questions posed on this forum often get answered in entirely tangential ways.

For example.

QUESTION: I've narrowed by short-list down to Ayre, Hegel, and Simaudio integrated amps.  Which would you choose between those three, and why?

ANSWER TYPE #1: None of those are what you really want to buy, because they're mediocre in comparison to others.  What you should really be looking at is Plinius or, if you can stretch, Gamut.

ANSWER TYPE #2: You're coming at this all wrong.  (2A) You should be looking at tube integrateds. (2B) You should definitely be looking at separates rather than integrated, ideally a tube pre-amp combined with a high-powered solid-state power amp.

ANSWER TYPE #3: most stereo sounds dreadful.  Only I have the key to true 3-dimensional sound, but I cannot divulge what that is.

Do you find these kinds of answers (a) helpful, (b) irritating, unhelpful, and counterproductive?



128x128twoleftears

Showing 1 response by french_fries

THE more specific the question, the greater the difficulty of giving a fully informed answer -unless you are a dealer of the 3 components in question, or a fanatically well-informed audiophile. maybe you've heard of ONE of the components, but in a not-so-great set-up.
or you have seen one of the pieces at a show or at a dealer but not
set up at all.  Maybe you have a pre-conceived opinion about the product line or someone you know has had a good (or bad) experience with their preamps or cd players.  People may tend to want to jump into a discussion about audio since not a ton of folks even know about specialized gear (beyond Bose or other popular stuff).  Google isn't even that great anymore...