Cablues - I own the avanti centuries but have not heard the avanti III. Besides being better looking, what are the sonic differences ?
I'm pretty happy with them. They are very detailed, and image wonderfully yet have a soft, listenable quality. Could use more weight. I've also owned/used the sparks, tempoIII, and virgoII's. You could say I like audio physics....
I've heard the talon khorusX, and I think it's one the best speaker's I've heard at any price. I think given a choice I would take the khorusX over my avanti-centurys. They have low end power which I have come to miss since owning vandersteen 5's, yet they are not huge nor ugly. I am not sure if the khorusX's do or don't have the same detail and imaging. They might. I would really have to hear them in my system.
I heard the AudioAero 192/Tenor/KhorusX setup at jtinn's. Best system I've ever heard, anywhere. I use a kern scd-1/vk-5i/vt100m2(kt88).
I'm pretty happy with them. They are very detailed, and image wonderfully yet have a soft, listenable quality. Could use more weight. I've also owned/used the sparks, tempoIII, and virgoII's. You could say I like audio physics....
I've heard the talon khorusX, and I think it's one the best speaker's I've heard at any price. I think given a choice I would take the khorusX over my avanti-centurys. They have low end power which I have come to miss since owning vandersteen 5's, yet they are not huge nor ugly. I am not sure if the khorusX's do or don't have the same detail and imaging. They might. I would really have to hear them in my system.
I heard the AudioAero 192/Tenor/KhorusX setup at jtinn's. Best system I've ever heard, anywhere. I use a kern scd-1/vk-5i/vt100m2(kt88).