It might be interesting as long as the listening part was set up by a third party with cables put in generic sleeves so noone knows which is which. Be fun to see if Teddy can pick his out better that chance.
Showing 10 responses by djones51
Using a neutral site isn't a red herring it's basic protocol to get an unbiased response but short of that there should be a third party who covers the cables being tested in a generic sleeve who gives them to another neutral party that switches them out. If the cables can be defined better than chance you have something other than that it's pissing in the wind. |
I would like to step away from audio for a moment to address something else raised here. Any parents or grandparents please DO NOT use teething necklaces they have been labeled dangerous by the FDA as children have died from strangulation and choking using these things. There is also absolutely no evidence to suggest they do anything. This has nothing to do with one side or the other in these silly arguments over audio reproduction this is a real and serious issue. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/fda-warns-against-use-teething-necklaces-b... |
I think this pretty well covers the reasons why. https://www.soundstagehifi.com/index.php/opinion/1536-the-four-surprising-reasons-why-some-reviewers... |