Sub-sat system the ultimate compromise ?


Stand mounted speakers create the best imaging and floorstanders produce full range sound. Do you think a "well integrated" sub-sat system the answer to both objectives? Let us know your opinion and the best sub-sat system you have ever heard.
stokjoc

Showing 1 response by sedond

i tink the sub-sat arrangement *is* the way-to-go - yust ask many designers of cost-no-object speaker-systems, which are in-fact sub-sat designs.

i have good results using a pair of vmps larger subs & a marchand deluxe version of their xm-9 x-over. the marchand has *wery* flexible controls, & w/24db/octave slope, can seemlessly mate the vmps' w/most anything. i've successfully used both thiel 3.5's & meret re's w/my subs. also successfully demo'd proac tablettes, totem arros, nht super ones. i hope to demo some proac 2.5's, & i hope to purchase some newform research's, not sure of the model.

vmps (a full-line speaker mfr, btw), will offer good set-up support for their subs. i feel they are more accurate than any sub at anywhere near the price - my sub system, consisting of 2 larger vmps', 2 adcom gfa555's run bridged-mono, & the marchand x-over, is about the same price as *one* top-model velodyne, w/all its amplification/electronics included. i woodn't trade my system for *2* velodynes.

oh yeah, i'm also a firm believer that 2 subs are needed for proper 2-channel audio.

regards, doug