Stuck: 20-bit/96kHz or 24-bit/96kHz DAC?


I'm a new audiophile so I don't pretend to know all the issues with regard to formats, but here's the rub:

I want to get the best sounding *used* CD player I can afford. Some years ago, the CAL CL-20 was a highly reviewed CD player, and it has my interest. I'd like to compare it's sound to a Toshiba SD-9200. I've heard the latter, and forgetting all about DVD-A and the player's usability faults, it makes an ordinary CD sound marvelous.

The CAL unit, like other older units, has a 20/96 DAC. The DAC in the Toshiba plays up to 24/192 for DVD-A. Assuming for the moment that the choice is between 20/96 (the CAL) and 24/96 (whatever else), how much sound performance am I giving up if I go with the 20/96?

I suppose what is really bothering me is something like the frustration I feel when my computer components become dated. Sure, they worked fine in the day, but now there's better to be had. I haven't yet auditioned 20/96 and likely won't be able to A/B test with a 24/96. The main point: if I go with a 20/96, am I buying something that I'll toss in a few years for playing red book CD audio?
im_all_ears

Showing 1 response by jburidan

Recommend not going 20-bit/96kHz. The CAL CL-20 is just O.K. compared to other affordable CDP's. A 24-bit tubed output stage can approach turntable/vinyl sound when tweaked with the right tubes for your system. Be patient and buy something you'll enjoy for many years. Recommend you look at the AH! Njoe Tjoeb 4000 with 24-bit/192kHz upsampling.
Jay