Stand out phono stages


This topic has been started before by others and myself as well, maybe too many times, but it is worth revisiting since the source is so very important!
So far I have had the pleasure to enjoy two worthy phono stages: the EAR 834p and the JLTI.
I have to admit they are spectacular. Obviously the record and all the equipment downstream play a role in the sound heard. In some cases I prefer the JLTI and in other cases the EAR. But neither out do the other dramatically.
What phono preamps outshine others by a big margin, those that can be considered the last phono preamp ever needed.
pedrillo

Showing 2 responses by zaikesman

I replaced a PSA GCPH with an EAR 324 (both run balanced-out). While it's true that the former is nice for the money, it's also true that the difference in price for the latter is an accurate reflection of the improvement in sound.
Duanedam: I have no experience with the Steelhead, but based on comparisons I've read between it and the EAR 324, I'm surprised, to say the least, that you felt the GCPH is that close to the Steelhead, particularly with an MC cart. (I found the GCPH to sound best on its lowest input gain setting.) That 98% comparison, plus your dissatisfaction with the bass, makes me wonder whether the tubes in your Steelhead may have been subpar or past their prime, because in my system the GCPH didn't come near that close to the 324 -- especially regarding the bass, and likewise for dynamics, textural purity, and transparency of natural tonality and fine detail resolution. (I would agree, however, that the PSA comes somewhat closer in the imaging department, and I still feel it's a nice 'stage for the money.)