Stack Audio Auva Isolator


I just ordered a set of these. They are supposed to be better than the Iso-Acoustics or even the Townshend podiums for speakers.

Anyone try these yet?

Auva Isolator - Stack Audio

ozzy

ozzy

Showing 3 responses by audiopoint

Hello Ozzy,

My opinion remains the same.

If it is not an Audio Point then comparisons are useless. Material science, shape, and intended use are part of the design. Every cone is not and will not perform the same - guaranteed. 

If you guys are going to compare devices IMHO “compare the prices” of each product! 

Townshend made a lot of money comparing their $2,500.00 device to $12.00 worth of nail head steel spikes. Iso-Acoustics did the same thing. 

 

You have been marketed. 

 

This tactic happens more now than ever before in this industry. 

The one common factor you have in all of these comparisons is price. Compare apples to oranges if you want to, but remember, the equipment rack you are using controls all your outcomes. 

Stack Audio retails products here in America and has a Patent Pending listed on their website. We have an Agreement with and honor US Patent # 9858903B2 which entails processes that have a similar description to the Stack technology. I am not the Patent owner but I want you to know this is more fair and believable than marketing to the public through questionable testing methodologies.

Robert

LiveVibe Audio

 

But I only mention this because I resent the owner and manufacturer of Audiopoints coming into this thread and schilling their own product especially when they obviously know nothing about the Stack Audio AUVA.

Agisthos, I am the owner and manufacturer of Audio Points™. 

I am not sure where this shilling thing took place.

We know how and why the Auva pucks function.

 Our company has an Agreement with the US Patent holder for a process using bearings as a primary resonance conductor in tubes, pucks, wood blocks, cones, cello end pins, microphone stands, etc. I know what is happening inside the Auva pucks. Bearing fillers have been used before in the Audio Industry. We also understand the cone and what goes on when combined with bearings.

 Pucks, cones, springs, dots, and spheres have been around in footer systems since the late 1980s. All of those companies closed. All those products are gone except one.

Reinvention with fancier cosmetics, machining, and materials and the willingness of the public to purchase that new much more expensive thing rejuvenate sales. To us, it has all been done before.

 

Everyone is invited to telephone me. I will answer all your questions or locate the individuals who can. You will know who I am and I will have no idea who you are. Fair enough?

After speaking together, if you still resent me, at least there is a reason compared to voicing a meaningless opinionated statement on a public forum.

Do you know how many real shills exist on all audio forums? Dozens of dealers and manufacturers, many member participants, and even more professional salespeople lurk behind every thread. We do not require or market AudioGon forums to increase sales.

Thank you for your time,

Robert

LiveVibe Audio

 

Hello Ozzy,

The two-inch Audio Points shown in your system are an older body style. A newer version released before COVID-19 establishes subtle differences in the newer body style’s sonic.

The sound increase occurs when adapting the new Coupling Discs (APCD5).

 

When comparing cones and pucks, the 2.5 and 3.5-inch Wide Body Audio Points are generally analyzed. 

The Award-Winning Rhythm Platforms and Rhythm JR Platforms serve as a higher value and sonic that shows off more about the resonance transfer process versus listening to three or four Audio Points.

You will note there is no difference in frequency affecting the character of your speaker system or any electronic product. You gain efficiency in component operation, reduced temperature, and hear more information from the equipment you own without clogging any signal pathway due to resonance build-up. 

Some of the products you mentioned alter frequency to enhance the sonic.

Your current use of the Audio Points is more of a floor connection to some type of woodblock used to support the amplifiers. This application is the dated catch-and-hold vibration method (isolation). I would position something between the electronics chassis and the top of the block. In your use, the Audio Points are only capable of mechanical grounding the block and will not achieve any measurable sonic improvements on the amplifiers.

The best method would be to install the electronics onto a Rhythm Platform. Should you like to give this a trial run, call me.  I will make the arrangements at no expense on your end. Just provide me with your results. We will provide return shipping labels. I am NOT attempting to shill or advertise on this forum. All information exchanged is confidential.

 

The new company is titled LiveVibe Audio. As I get older and Live-Vibe Technology™ is beginning to expand, I want to leave the planet with the company intact. This new business structure allows for expansion and awards those who have worked with us to achieve this point. We welcome a new breed of innovation and growth potential exceeding far beyond that of audio alone.  

 

Let me know by phone if you want to audition the Audio Point’s evolution. Rhythm Platforms and the Rhythm Juniors are much more than a few thirty-five-year-old parts and easily compete with all vibration management products in the marketplace.

 

Robert

330-260-6769